The Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act: Is ILSA A Land Mine Ready To Explode For Condo Developers?

The Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (“ILSA”) is a federal law which was passed in the late 1960s to protect buyers of out-of-state land.  Those were the days when parcels of vacant land might be advertised to far-flung speculators as promising wonderful development opportunies.  Only once the land was purchased and the purchaser travelled to take a look at the parcel for the first time, it would turn out to be a worthless, isolated patch of desert or swamp with little or no potential to access the infrastructure or resources needed to sustain a viable development project.

In the years since ILSA was passed, the law has been held to apply to condominium developments.  And as real estate market watchers know, pre-construction condo investments in places like South Florida may appear to present many of the same problems that vacant land sales once did.  In particular, pre-construction condos are advertised as glamorous out-of-state investment opportunities — a chance to make money while literally owning a cutting-edge piece of paradise.  But the glamour wears off quickly once the market takes a downward turn and the buyer is unable to resell the property, whereupon he or she scrutinizes the development with a critical eye.  At this point, the buyer detects ways in which the building (which may not yet be fully constructed) deviates from what he or she believes was promised before signing the purchase agreement, and the buyer begins to feel cheated.

This article by a partner in the D.C. office of Holland & Knight provides a useful overview of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, from the perspective of advising developers to fully comply with its requirements in order to avoid pitfalls down the road.  One of the significant requirements of ILSA is that the developer register the development with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and furnish a thick “Property Report” to the buyer before he or she signs the purchase agreement.  Not surprisingly, developers don’t want to comply with this somewhat onerous requirement if they don’t absolutely have to.  And in fact, there are a number of exemptions which developers can take advantage in order to avoid the registration and Property Report requirement.

One particularly important exemption, which is widely misunderstood, is the so-called “two-year” exemption.  Generally speaking, a developer does not need to register with HUD and provide a Property Report if the developer provides a contractual commitment to build the development within two years after the date the buyer signs the purchase agreement.  As this article from the Florida Bar Journal describes, however, the “two year” exemption is not as straightforward as it may seem, because while developers may seek to “qualify” any two year commitment by limiting the buyer’s remedies in the event that the two-year deadline is missed, Florida courts are rather strict in their interpretation of the exemption such that the developer may actually lose the exemption if it qualifies the two-year deadline in such a manner.

Of special importance on this last point is 15 U.S.C. section 1703(c), a section of ILSA which provides that in the event a Property Report is required but the buyer is not provided one prior to signing the purchase agreement, the buyer has the option of revoking the contract.  Given the current real estate market, it is unsurprising that there a number of cases currently on the docket in Florida state and federal courts allege that buyers (who are seeking to get out of their condo contracts) were not provided a Property Report when they should have been.  Time will tell whether the courts agree with these buyers and find that the failure to provide a Property Report is an adequate basis to cancel their contracts. (See here for my previous article on issues relating to the buyer’s right to rescission under Florida state law, which is distinct from the federal law remedy under ILSA.).

By Jared H. Beck, Esq.

This article does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship, and is not for re-publication without express permission of the author.

Mr. Beck has a law degree from Harvard Law School, and practices law in the courts of South Florida. His law firm, Beck & Lee Business Trial Lawyers in Miami, is dedicated to the practice of business and real estate litigation. A significant portion of Mr. Beck’s practice is devoted to issues arising under condominium and other real estate purchase agreements. He can be reached at 305-789-0072 or jared@beckandlee.com

About these ads

14 Comments

Filed under Beck & Lee Business Trial Lawyers, Cancel Real Estate Purchase Agreement, Condo Cancellation Lawsuit, Florida Condo Law, Florida Condominium Contract Attorney, Florida Real Estate Lawyer, Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, Miami Condo Contract Lawyer, Miami Deposit Recovery Lawyer

14 responses to “The Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act: Is ILSA A Land Mine Ready To Explode For Condo Developers?

  1. Pingback: The Right To Peaceably Assemble In Condo Common Areas « The Magic City Harvard Lawyer: A High-Octane, Unfiltered Report From Miami

  2. F D

    The truth is that so many would-be investors bought without thinking. Some of them really overextended themselves and are now looking for any possible way to avoid to close on a condominium that they can no longer flip.
    I am curious to see if the courts will interpret the law with this new condominium market, or will simply apply what was at the beginning designed for vacant land.
    Thanks for the very interesting information. Best regards.
    FD @ Condo Hotel Miami Beach

  3. Good points FD. From the buyer’s perspective, there is always the risk that the courts will interpret the law in a manner colored by a lack of sympathy for the failed flipper. On the other side of the coin, however, there are developers out there who may have cut corners when times were good such that under the law, they should pay the consequences no matter who the plaintiffs happen to be.

  4. Pingback: Update: More Florida Condo Contract Lawsuits Filed Which May Yield Important Developments In Condo Contract Law « The Magic City Harvard Lawyer: A High-Octane, Unfiltered Report From Miami, Florida

  5. Pingback: Terms Of New Miami Beach Condo Class Action Settlement Harken Back To Happier Times For The Florida Condo Market « The Magic City Harvard Lawyer: A High-Octane, Unfiltered Report From Miami, Florida

  6. Pingback: New Condo Lawsuits With A Curious Procedural Posture « The Magic City Harvard Lawyer: A High-Octane, Unfiltered Report From Miami, Florida

  7. Pingback: Some Thoughts On The Yin and Yang Of Florida Condo Contract Litigation « The Magic City Harvard Lawyer: A High-Octane, Unfiltered Report From Miami, Florida

  8. Scott

    I understand this blog is focused on Florida laws and properties, but can ILSA be applied the same way in places like California and Nevada?

  9. Pingback: Pugliese v. Pukka Development, Inc.: The ILSA Quagmire Gets Thicker For Developers As A New Opening For Condo Contract Revocation Emerges « The Magic City Harvard Lawyer: A High-Octane, Unfiltered Report From Miami, Florida

  10. Pingback: Singer Island Resort Buyers File Securities Class Action Against WCI Communities « The Magic City Harvard Lawyer: A High-Octane, Unfiltered Report From Miami, Florida

  11. JD

    Scot
    To answer your question yes. Federal laws apply almost everywhere in the USA. Only dont forget to check your local laws in addition to the ILSA.

  12. Pingback: Corporate America’s Unlikely Epicenter | The PULSE Review

  13. Jared,
    First thank you for visiting my blog and your comments. This article is very informative and kudos for you for catching the issue in its early stages. I am amazed at the explosion of litigation and arbitration claims stemming from a law that so few attorneys fully understand.

  14. Pingback: The New Wave Of ILSA Case Law: Charting The Course Of Consumer Protection For The Next Real Estate Boom Out Of Lessons Learned From The Present Crisis « Jared Beck’s Real Estate Market Crisis Law Report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s