http://beckandlee.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/a-federal-courts-strong-analysis-of-the-interstate-land-sales-full-disclosure-act-ilsa-and-some-thoughts-on-how-the-hud-regulations-can-shed-light-on-ilsa/ Notes On The Latest Developments In Florida And U.S. Real Estate, Condominium, And Condo-Hotel Law. Questions Or Comments? Contact Attorney Jared Beck (B.A. Harvard, J.D. Harvard) At 305-789-0072 Or jared@beckandlee.com. Mr. Beck Is Based In The "Magic City" Of Miami, Florida. Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:54:50 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://beckandlee.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/a-federal-courts-strong-analysis-of-the-interstate-land-sales-full-disclosure-act-ilsa-and-some-thoughts-on-how-the-hud-regulations-can-shed-light-on-ilsa/#comment-1215 T.O Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:47:13 +0000 http://beckandlee.wordpress.com/?p=103#comment-1215 In addition to the CFR there is the Federal Register. There are many practical explanations and examples provided by HUD explaining the regulations. For examples see 61 FR 13596 (1996). In addition to the CFR there is the Federal Register. There are many practical explanations and examples provided by HUD explaining the regulations. For examples see 61 FR 13596 (1996).

]]> http://beckandlee.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/a-federal-courts-strong-analysis-of-the-interstate-land-sales-full-disclosure-act-ilsa-and-some-thoughts-on-how-the-hud-regulations-can-shed-light-on-ilsa/#comment-1194 J.H. Wed, 28 May 2008 01:03:14 +0000 http://beckandlee.wordpress.com/?p=103#comment-1194 The Harvey case mentioned in your blog reminds me of a 90s case in Federal court where the court ruled that contracts that included language that denied the buyer the right of specific performance (even though State law allowed this language) showed a lack of obligation to construct the project within two years and therefore the condo project did not qualify for the Improved Lot Exemption. Most contracts have a lot of built-in boilerplate language, such as specific performance and delays due to weather, etc., and looks like a lot of that is biting us in the rear right about now. The Harvey case mentioned in your blog reminds me of a 90s case in Federal court where the court ruled that contracts that included language that denied the buyer the right of specific performance (even though State law allowed this language) showed a lack of obligation to construct the project within two years and therefore the condo project did not qualify for the Improved Lot Exemption. Most contracts have a lot of built-in boilerplate language, such as specific performance and delays due to weather, etc., and looks like a lot of that is biting us in the rear right about now.

]]>